We make our choices known when we vote. If our government does not know what we want, they do not have to consider us in their planning and define the future we wish. The focus of every campaign is selecting a candidate who can attract a large constituent group. Our vote is the main way to participate and we are drawn to candidates who represent us. Representation counts. How do we make these choices? What drives our choices? This discussion investigates the creative expressions of the candidates, their families, and spokespeople. We compare this to the electorate, outlining how Creative Expressions, Actualization Levels, and WorldView define the issues and odds of any party winning.
The clearer we are about what works and does not, the better our lives will be. This election demonstrates that there are different paths to follow that can have profound consequences. Let us hope that, as the United States becomes more conscious, it will become more responsive to its citizenry. At this time in history, we are growing out of our teenage years as a Compassionate, Visionary, and Storyteller country, where shiny ideals and the use of money are predominant ways we garner attention. Do we have enough awareness to see this journey for what it is, or will we let anger, fear, desire, and election promises minimize our choices?
We will also discuss how can we limit partisan polarization. How can we see and include others in our exploration? How can we deal with increasing objectification, subjectification, and idealization? What we need is a CNG process that reconciles the past for both Republicans and Democrats. The premise is: Do we need to unite to solve world problems? In a time of changing humanity, growing networks of self-affirmation, and expanding isolation, separation, and insulation, how can we navigate our opportunities more consciously? Our election represents the testing of our consciousness. It provides very clear alternative ways to view the future.